Bulenox, founded in 2022, based in US, and Tradeify247, founded in 2026, based in US, are both popular choices among futures and crypto prop traders. Bulenox offers up to $2,750,000 in funding across 5 accounts, while Tradeify247 provides up to $300,000.
Bulenox returns more to the trader with a 90% profit split. Bulenox has the stronger reputation with a 4.7/5 trader rating. Bulenox scales the furthest with up to $2.8M in funding. True cost compares Bulenox's $50,000 Trailing account with Tradeify247's $50,000 1-Step Evaluation account, after current discounts and activation fees.
| Feature | Bulenox | Tradeify247 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Split | 90% | 80% |
| Trader rating | 4.7/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Max Funding | $2,750,000 | $300,000 |
| True Cost (selected account) | not published · $50,000 | not published · $50,000 |
| Max Drawdown (selected account) | $2,500 | $3,000 |
| Daily Loss Limit (selected account) | None | $1,500 |
| Largest Account | $150,000 | $100,000 |
| Payout Frequency | Weekly | On demand |
| Min First Payout | 0 days | 0 days |
| Evaluation Type | 1-step, Instant funding | 2-step, 1-step, Instant funding |
| Platforms | 22 | 4 |
| Discount | up to 89% off | up to 35% off |
Read the full Bulenox review for rules, pricing tiers and payout details.
Read the full Tradeify247 review for rules, pricing tiers and payout details.
Bulenox offers a 90% profit split with 1-step/Instant funding evaluation, while Tradeify247 offers a 80% profit split with 2-step/1-step/Instant funding evaluation. Bulenox supports 22 trading platforms and Tradeify247 supports 4. Bulenox has a trader rating of 4.7/5 compared to Tradeify247's 4.1/5.
Compare the latest pricing for both firms on their respective account pages.
Bulenox pays out weekly with a minimum of $1,000, while Tradeify247 pays out on demand with a minimum of $100. Bulenox requires 0 trading days for the first payout, and Tradeify247 requires 0 trading days for the first payout.
Bulenox does not publish a trading-bot policy, while Tradeify247 allows trading bots globally. On VPNs, Bulenox does not publish a VPN policy and Tradeify247 permits VPN use.
Bulenox vs Tradeify247 for 2026: compare evaluation types (1-step, Instant funding vs 2-step, 1-step, Instant funding), payout cadence for the selected accounts (Weekly vs On demand), platforms, and true challenge cost. Bulenox offers a higher profit split (90% vs 80%). Use the tables below for drawdown, minimum days, and current promotion status before you buy.
Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission when you use our links. How we stay unbiased.
Tradeify247Bulenox
4.7 / 5 trader rating
Bulenox
90% to the trader
Bulenox
$2.8M max funding
Tradeify247
On demand
Bulenox returns more to the trader with a 90% profit split. Bulenox has the stronger reputation with a 4.7/5 trader rating. Bulenox scales the furthest with up to $2.8M in funding.
Tradeify247$50K | ||
|---|---|---|
| Account Pricing | ||
| Price | Not published | Not published |
| Activation Fee | $148 | Not published |
| True Cost | Not published | Not published |
| Reset Fee | $78 | Not available |
| Current Promotion | Not published | Not published |
| Evaluation Phase | ||
| Profit Target | Best value: $3,0006.0% of account | $6,00012.0% of account |
| Max Drawdown | $2,500 | $3,000 |
| Drawdown Type | Intraday | Static |
| Daily Loss Limit | Best value: None | $1,500 |
| Max Position Size | Best value: 7 contracts | N/A |
| Consistency Rule | Not published | No |
| Funded Phase | ||
| Max Drawdown | $2,500 | $3,000 |
| Drawdown Type | Intraday | Static |
| Daily Loss Limit | Best value: None | $1,500 |
| Max Payout/Cycle | $1,500Min: $1000 | Best value: UncappedMin: $100 |
| Consistency Rule | 40% | No |
| Value MetricsDerived from price, discount, targets and payout caps — fewer breakeven cycles and higher first-cycle ROI mean the account pays for itself faster. | ||
| Breakeven Winning Cycles | — | — |
| Max First-Cycle ROI | — | — |
| Target : Drawdown | Best value: 1.20lower = easier to pass | 2.00lower = easier to pass |
| Company Info | ||
| Established | 2022 | 2026 |
| CEO | Not disclosed | Brett Simberkoff |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Trader Rating | Best value: 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Features | ||
| Allows Scaling | No | No |
| Daily Payouts | No | Yes |
| 1-Day Pass | Yes | No |
| KYC Required | Required | Required |
| Trading | ||
| Instruments | EMD, ES, RTY, NQ, MES, MNQ, M2K, MBT +35 more | Not published |
| Evaluation Types | 1-step, Instant funding | 2-step, 1-step, Instant funding |
| Platforms | R|Trader Pro, NinjaTrader, Bookmap +19 more | DXTrade, MetaTrader 5, Gold-i +1 more |
| Max Funding | Best value: $2.75M | $300,000 |
| Profit Split | Best value: 90% | 80% |
| Max Accounts | 5 funded · Unlimited evaluation | Not published funded · Not published evaluation |
| Trading Rules | ||
| Scalping | Allowed | Allowed |
| Payouts | ||
| Payout Frequency | Weekly | On demand |
| Min Payout | from $500 | $100 |
| Payout Methods | ACH transfer, Wire transfer +1 more | Rise, Crypto +1 more |
| Payout StructureHow money actually leaves the account: what you must do to qualify, how much each payout may be, and when the cap stops applying. | ||
| Payout cadence | Weekly | On demand |
| Eligibility | 10 trading days · profit above buffer | 3 profitable days |
| Payout cap | $1,500 (#1-#3) → uncapped from #4 | Uncapped |
| Payout limit | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Safety-net buffer | Max loss + $100 | None |
| Scaling | None | None |
| Activation fee | One-time | None |
| Evaluation TermsThe shape of the challenge itself, including where the consistency rule applies — an evaluation-only rule and one that binds for the life of the account are very different obligations. | ||
| Evaluation type | 1-step | 1-step |
| Time limit | 30 days | None |
| Min trading days | None | None |
| Fastest possible pass | 1 day | — |
| Resets | Allowed | Not available |
| Consistency rule | 40% | None |
| Consistency applies to | Whole account life | No rule |
| What You May TradeEach firm's own position on the strategies traders get breached for, with its published qualification. A restriction is not the same as a ban. | ||
| News trading | ✓ Allowed… | ✓ Allowed |
| Weekend holding | ✗ Not allowed“All positions must be closed before the session close; overnight and weekend positions are prohibited” (Momentum… | ✓ Allowed |
| Overnight holding | ? Not published“Holding positions overnight is strictly prohibited” (Qualification Rules), with the hard deadline… | ✓ AllowedThe original position size must remain intact across the 22:00 UTC reset; closing part before reset and carrying the… |
| Bots & automation | ? Not publishedPermitted by the FAQ and the help centre, but gated by the Terms of Use, and the two are never reconciled.… | ✓ AllowedTrading bots are allowed if you own or have exclusive rights to the bot.… |
| High-frequency trading | ? Not publishedProhibited in substance by the same Terms of Use clause.… | ✗ Not allowedHigh-frequency trading strategies are not allowed. |
| Dollar-cost averaging | ? Not publishedNo rule on averaging down, scaling into a position, martingale or grid trading appears anywhere on the public site.… | ? Not publishedDCA strategies are permitted within risk parameters. |
| Hedging | ? Not publishedThe word “hedge” and its variants appear nowhere in the help centre, the FAQ or the four legal PDFs — no rule addresses… | ✗ Not allowed |
| Copy trading | ? Not publishedCopiers are named in the same answer as bots and carry the same limit… | ✓ AllowedOwn-account copiers and exclusively licensed tools are allowed; shared auto-executing signals are prohibited.… |
| Microscalping | ? Not publishedRestricted, and only in its automated form.… | ✗ Not allowedAll trades must be held for at least 20 seconds.… |
| VPN | ? Not publishedNo VPN, VPS, proxy or connection-location rule is published.… | ✓ AllowedVPN/VPS is allowed for personal use; masking account sharing is prohibited.… |